Sunday, October 31, 2010

Film Review: "Almost Famous"

"Almost Famous" (Directed by Cameron Crowe, 2000) 



"Almost Famous" is the coming-of-age story of 15 year old William. A kid growing up in suburbia California during the 70's, at a time when rock'n roll was transforming into a product of the industry and Rolling Stone was cementing its place in the world of pop culture manufacturing as the main purveyor of rock music advertising. William, played by  Patrick Fugit, is a fictional representation of Crowe, who was a real life teenage reporter for Rolling Stone. While, the film is based on Crowe's real life experiences in the world of rock 'n roll, the story is by no means faithfully autobiographical. Instead, Crowe takes liberties with the story successfully blending in real life events with fantasy. What results, is a story that captures the vibe of a decade lived through the music, without being bogged down by inconsequential facts.
    Contributing to the success of the film of course, is the cast ensemble. Each actor was expertly cast to embody their character, and in general give such nuanced performances that for brief moments you suspect that they might be playing a hyperrealistic version of themselves. Kate Hudson and Fairuza Balk shine as the infectiously vivacious and carefree "Penny Lane" and the smart, no-non-sense  "Sapphire," respectively. Playing self-righteous groupies, or "Band Aides" as they call themselves, they liven up the screen each time they make an appearance. Phillip Seymour Hoffman also brightens up the film with his rambunctious interpretation of the legendary "Lester Bangs." Hoffman's commitment to stay true to the Lester Bangs persona is most obviously felt in the scene where he's back in the San Francisco radio station. As the host speaks, he wildly paces around looking at the music records and passionately pointing out the good from the bad. Finally, he abruptly takes the spinning record, tosses it and replaces it with some real rock 'n roll, more appropriate for his wild dancing moves. Although he appears sparingly he steals every scene his in, even outshining Fugit. Of course, the less experienced Fugit can't  yet rival Hoffman's expertise but although he falters in scenes that require more emotional stretch, he is still able to hold his own playing a credibly earnest and precocious, but also incredibly naive kid. Although William goes through an extraordinary adventure, and despite living with an eccentric family, he is a very ordinary kid who fantasizes about living the rock star life. Fugit's character injects the necessary dose of reality to the film to keep it from becoming a parody of its self.
    Crowe, for the most part was able to find the right balance of fact and fiction however, it seems that he stumbled with the ending. While he gave the audience what he taught the audience was looking for, a happy ending, this was probably not the most effective way of ending such a fantastic story. Yes, "Penny" realized her dream of going to Morocco, "Stillwater," (the film's fictional rising rock band), made it big without loosing its integrity, and William got his Rolling Stone story published but, this was the expected ending. Wouldn't it have been more satisfying if Crowe kept it real and instead of having a rosy ending "Penny" got tossed and forgotten, "Stillwater" became nothing more than a one-hit wonder, and William's story went unpublished? Or if it went on fantasy overdrive and "Penny" became a rock star wife, "Stillwater" became the new Rolling Stones and William took Jann Wenner's job? It seems that Crowe got stuck and scared so he chose the easy way out. It's a shame, because such an excellent movie deserved an excellent ending.
   

Monday, October 18, 2010

'Hot Tub Time Machine' Trailer

Back to the Future ÷ 1980s x (Hot Tub + Time Machine) = Good Times!

"Hot Tub Time Machine" (Directed by Steve Pink, 2010)
Hollywood, is this a joke? Hot tub + Time Machine!? Ouch. Another, hit to the intellect of movie audiences has been delivered. But, really? How promising can a movie entitled "Hot Tub Time Machine be?" Not very. But that's the idea here, this film is not meant to offer some kind of self-reflexive commentary on adulthood nor does it aim to enlightened us with some cheesy life-lessons. All it promises is a couple of hours of mindless  and ridiculous fun times and it delivers. 
    The plot itself is not very original, it feels like a raunchier version of "Back to the Future," (with an appearance by Crispin Glover as a looser included). Marty McFly is replaced by three loser best friends: Lou (Rob Coddry), Nick (Craig Robison), and Adam (John Cusack); who are  leading dissatisfying adult lives resulting from poor romantic relationships. When Lou, the reckless drunk of the group, has a supposed suicide attempt the friends reunite to cheer him up and reluctantly go on a trip to their old hang out place, the 'Kodiak Ski Valley Resort' to relive some good times taking Adam's nephew, Jacob (Clark Duke), along for the ride. After discovering that the years have turned the resort into a dump and having no option but to stay, the guys decide get into the newly repaired hot tub and enjoy the night. After a crazy night they wake up to go skiing only to find themselves among a sea of neon spandex and an 80s soundtrack. It's 1986 and they must relive that day exactly as they did or they risk causing 'a butterfly effect' altering the space-time continuum and resulting in Jacob, (who's body is flickering!), never being born.
    Of course, the guys realize that the 80s they so fondly remembered really weren't that great either and now they must relive the shitty day that defined their future, and the antics ensue. The movie takes some quick jabs at 80s pop culture but unlike "Back to the Future" it doesn't remain hung up on the setting/time frame for jokes like it comfortably could have. Instead, it relies on the characters' responses to the outrageous situations they find themselves in for comedic effect. Craig Robison and Rob Coddry take credit for carrying most of the comedic scenes. Their timing is spot on and their unassuming performances allow their characters to feel more 'natural' & real and less forceful than the efforts by Cusack. Likewise, Clark Duke's character goes beyond the typical computer age sexed up kid to become the unlikely voice of reason and the sobering agent of the film.
    Needless to say, this movie could not call itself a gross-out guy comedy without the gross-out gags or the misogynistic, homophobic and sex jokes which came at a dime a dozen. Yet, the movie moves so fast that the punches are short and quick, and therefore there isn't enough time for cheap one-liners to linger. Instead the viewer is meant to digest whole situation.
    The bottom line is, the film was not laugh-out-loud funny but it was definitely entertaining. Low expectations leave room for big surprises and this certainly was the case with "Hot Tub Time Machine."  The movie, like its title, was completely ridiculous in the best sense of the word. If its fault is that it is a rip-off "Back to the Future" so, what? There are far inferior and witless comedies that have done the same. This film was at least 101minutes of unpretentious fun.