Thursday, September 30, 2010

A Studio Visit With Tim Anderson

 Tim Anderson, Studio Visit, 1224 W. Grand

            
                 Upon entering Tim Anderson's studio, one can instantly imagine the process involved in the conception of his paintings. The long wall on the left houses Anderson's old record collection, his collection of brushes, oil paints and other traditional painting materials. The upper area is mostly covered with small drawings & paintings and what appear to be old family photographs and found portraits bought in bulk from the flea market. On the opposite wall, on either side of the couch, are bookcases stocked with books on travel, traditional furniture design and master painters. Indeed, it quickly becomes obvious that Anderson's fascination with portraiture is an extension of his preoccupation with the implications of traditional cultural norms in contemporary painting.
            When asked about what characteristics he looks for in the models for his paintings Anderson  simply responds, " I look for people who are receptive, who take me to another place." His current focus the "Yellow Portraits," undoubtedly embody this sentiment. "AT1194  Santa Gemma," one of a few portraits of Saints in the series, portrays a woman in modest clothes and a demure demeanor against a lemon yellow background. The portrait, done in oil and graphite, conveys a sense of nostalgic wonder. "Saint Gemma's" face, filling much of the canvas demands to be seen directly in the eyes, yet her gaze is neither piercing nor empty but rather, it emanates a sense of wisdom, a knowledge gathered from experiences of a distant past and place that will remain forever unknown to us.
            Despite painting subjects cemented in the past "Saint Gemma," like the rest of the portraits in the series, becomes a formal study of contrasts. Although the portrait is done in the traditional oil and graphite mediums the choice of colors thrusts the painting into a contemporary platform. The simple, gestural, black markings of the portrait contrasts with the acid lemon-yellow background. The artificiality of the yellow pigment reinforces the timelessness of the portraits and paradoxically serves as a method of re-contextualization. It puts into question the place of figurative imagery in today's art world, by alienating the subject and the mark making from a contextual background and placing them in a desolate pool of synthetic yellow paint.
            The most successful work on display however, is Anderson’s small abstract paintings. The roughly twelve to fifteen paintings where grouped together above Anderson’s scooters in a corner of the kitchen that is off view from the main sitting area. They almost seem to be hidden, certainly they are segregated from the figurative work littering the rest of the studio but once the viewer happens to walk upon them it is difficult to resist the allure of the paint lines running across the paper. Anderson’ spoke about several artists that have influenced his work mentioning everyone form the Flemish master painters, to Joseph Beuys, to Chuck Close. In these abstract paintings however, the influence of another artist that he mentioned, Willem De Kooning, becomes markedly apparent. Like De Kooning’s paintings, Anderson’s pieces, (completed as a series of works on paper named “La Comedia Dell’arte”), convey a sense of fluidity and loose gestural movements uninhibited by the restrictions of traditional painting conventions. Even, the paintings that seem to vaguely reference elements of the figure feel light and relaxed. In fact, Anderson’s unrestricted mark making style is what links this abstract work to the portraits. Although, the portraits are traditional formal studies, the unfinished sketch-like quality of the marks prevents the paintings from becoming fully engulfed by tradition.
           

Monday, September 27, 2010

Critical Condition: Criticism 101 (Why you should/n't listen to that guy's rants, and how you can qualify to be That guy!)


"What qualifies someone to be a critic?" -
This is the question posed by Kris Vire, (theatre critic for Time Out Chicago and the blog, Storefront Rebellion), to a few of his fellow colleagues from the critiquing world. In a culture where everyone has something to say about everything, the differences between half-baked opinions and developed critical responses become difficult to distinguish. One common trait that all critics agreed is essential to qualify someone as a critic is passion.
Donna Seaman, (book critic for Booklist and WLUW's Open Books), argues that passion and dedication for any particular art are the motivating factors behind the critics' need to voice their opinions. Merely being educated, therefore, becomes irrelevant if the eagerness to fiercely promote or downplay a particular subject/idea is lacking. Rather, Seaman asserts, "passion must lead to discipline and immersion. Expertise is gained from sustained attention" …"on going self-education is essential."
Indeed, immersing oneself in the arts but more importantly, becoming self-aware of the preconceptions with which one looks at said art is what distinguishes thoughtful criticism from arbitrary opinion. 
A good critic must not only be able to physically and metaphorically illustrate the subject under review but he must also capture the experiential moment. Seaman states, "writing is always about exposing the workings of the mind…" To be able to translate a particular experience, the critic must be able to, as Seaman says, "imagine responses, and see the experience in a greater context." This gives the critic the opportunity to place their assessments into perspective and, if not validate, at least legitimize the reasoning behind their particular viewpoint to the audience.

On Style:
Vire also asked the critics to comment on the their approach to writing both on print and online. The general consensus was that most take on an informal conversational style when writing for the web. Even in serious publications, the predominant tone of their online reviews seems to take a more casual approach. Of course, the interactive nature of the web incites the employment of more informal strategies to connect with readers. Seaman correctly asserts that, "conversation is vital." It enables the writing to become a platform for discussion and invites readers to become active participants in the debate. What can be more stimulating for a critic than receiving a passionate response from a reader, even if it is to thrash them?